Essential Writings of Buddhism
The Diamond Sutra and
the Lotus Sutra
Dwight Goddard and H. Kern, Translaters
Red and Black Publishers, St Petersburg, Florida
Preface Copyright
(c) 2010 by Red and Black Publishers
The Diamond Sutra,
translated by Dwight Goddard, 1932
The Lotus Sutra,
translated by H Kern, 1884
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Tripitaka. Sutrapitaka. Prajñaparamita.
Vajracchedika. English.
Essential writings of Buddhism : the Diamond sutra and the Lotus sutra /
Dwight Goddard and H. Kern, translators.
p. cm.
"The Diamond Sutra, translated by Dwight Goddard, 1932. The Lotus
Sutra, translated by H Kern, 1884."
ISBN 978-1-934941-84-3
1. Tripitaka. Sutrapitaka. Prajñaparamita.
Vajracchedika--Commentaries. 2. Tripitaka. Sutrapitaka.
Saddharmapundarikasutra--Commentaries. I. Goddard, Dwight, 1861-1939.
II. Kern, H. (Hendrik), 1833-1917. III. Tripitaka. Sutrapitaka.
Saddharmapundarikasutra. IV. Title.
BQ1992.E5G63 2010
294.3'823--dc22
2010011555
Red and Black
Publishers, PO Box 7542, St Petersburg, Florida, 33734
Contact us at: info@RedandBlackPublishers.com
Printed and manufactured in the United States of America
Contents
Editor’s Preface
5
The Diamond Sutra
7
The Lotus Sutra
21
Editor’s Preface
The
Diamond Sutra
The
Diamond Sutra was written in India in the 4th century. It takes the form of a
conversation between the Gautama Buddha and his disciple Subhuti in front of
the monastery students, after they have finished their daily walk to beg for
food. In front of the assembled
monks, Subhuti asks the Buddha a question, and there follows a conversation
about those who seek enlightenment (the Tathagata) and those who have attained
enlightenment (the Bodhisattva). The
underlying theme of the work is the unity of all things, and the quest of the
monk to directly see and experience this unity.
The title of the Sutra refers to the multiple facets of a diamond,
which each reflect the whole.
In
the 5th century, the Diamond Sutra was translated into Chinese by the Indian
scholar Kumarajiva. A copy of this translation, printed with carved wood
blocks, is in the possession of the British Library.
It bears the inscription "Reverently produced for free
distribution by Wang Jie on behalf of his parents, on the 15th of the 4th moon
of the 9th year of Xiantong". This
dates the copy to May 868 CE, during the T'ang Dynasty, making it the oldest
known complete printed book which bears a date—almost 600 years older than
Gutenberg's Bible.
Since the Diamond Sutra is relatively short, it is often
memorized by Buddhist monks and chanted as part of their daily ritual.
It
is often said that if a person really understands just four lines of the
Diamond Sutra, he will reach enlightenment.
The
Lotus Sutra
It
is not clear when the Sutra of the Lotus of the Wonderful Law was written. Tradition holds that it was written during Buddha's lifetime
by one of his students, but there is no record of it until 255 CE, when a
Chinese translation appears.
According
to one tradition, the Lotus Sutra was written in the time of the Buddha but
was hidden in a secret place, guarded by Nagas (giant cobras) for 500 years,
until humanity was ready to understand the lessons it contains.
When it finally became available to humanity, the Lotus Sutra replaced
all the previous teachings, and thus became known as the Greater Vehicle.
The Mahayana school of Buddhism is based on this tradition.
In
406 CE, the Indian scholar Kamarajiva made another translation into Chinese.
After that, the original Sanskrit versions were lost.
In
the 6th century CE, the Lotus Sutra was taken to Japan by followers of the
Chinese monk Chih-i. In Japan,
Chih-i's T'ien-t'ai school became known as Tendai, and it soon became one of
the major Japanese Buddhist traditions. The Lotus Sutra also influenced the
Nichiren school.
The
Lotus Sutra takes the form of a speech given by Buddha at a mountain village
in India. He is attended not only
by human monks, but also by mythical beings, gods, Boddhisattvas, and all the
rest of creation.
The
sutra lays out the three basic ideas of Buddhism: the basic unity of all
things and the ability of all sentient beings to reach enlightenment through
the realization of that unity, the necessity of individual insight and direct
experience, rather than reliance on written texts, in seeking enlightenment,
and the unity of all paths to enlightenment, which use different methods and
rituals, but all reach the same goal.
THE DIAMOND SUTRA
Thus have I heard.
Upon a memorable occasion, the Lord Buddha sojourned in the kingdom of Shravasti,
lodging in the grove of Jeta, a park within the royal domain which Jeta, the
heir-apparent, had bestowed upon Sutana, a minister of state renouned for his
charities and benefactions. With the Lord Buddha there were assembled twelve
hundred and fifty mendicant disciples, besides many who had attained to eminent
degrees of spiritual wisdom.
As the hour for the morning meal approached, Lord Buddha attired in a mendicant’s robe and carrying an alms bowl, walked towards the great cry of Shravasti which he entered to beg for food. Within the city he went from door to door and received such gifts as the good people severally bestowed. Concluding this religious exercise, the Lord Buddha returned to the grove of Jeta and after bathing his sacred feet partook of the frugal meal which he had received as alms. Thereafter he divested himself of the mendicant’s robe, laid aside the alms bowl and accepted the seat of honor which his disciples had reserved for him.
The venerable Subhuti, who occupied a place in the midst of the assembly, rose from his seat, arranged his robe so that his right shoulder was exposed, pressing the palms of his hands together, and kneeling upon his right knee, respectfully bowed to the Lord Buddha, saying: “Thou art of transcendent wisdom, Honored of the Worlds! With wonderful solicitude thou dost instruct in the Dharma and preserve in the faith this illustrious assembly of enlightened disciples. Blessed One, may I beseech of you to discourse upon the theme: How should a disciple who has entered upon the path behave? How should he advance? How should he restrain his thoughts? How may he realise Buddahood? What immutable Truth is there that shall sustain the mind of a good disciple, who is seeking to attain supreme spiritual wisdom, and bring into subjection every inordinate desire?”
The
Lord Buddha replied to Sabuti, saying: “Truly a most excellent theme. Attend
diligently unto me and I will enunciate a Truth whereby the mind of a good
disciple, whether man or woman, seeking to attain supreme spiritual wisdom shall
be adequately sustained and enabled to bring into subjection every inordinate
desire.
“Subhuti,
it is by the Truth of emptiness and egolessness that enlightened disciples are
to advance along the Path, to restrain their thoughts, to attain Buddahood. If
they diligently observe the Paramitas, and fully enter into a realisation of the
profound Prajna Paramita, they will attain the supreme spiritual wisdom they
seek.”
Dana Paramita—Ideal
Charity
“Subhuti, good disciples, whether man or woman, should thus arrange their thoughts. Every species of life whether hatched in an egg, formed in a womb, evolved from spawn, produced by metamorphosis, with or without form, possessing or devoid of natural instinct or intelligence—from these changeful conditions of being, I urge you to seek deliverance in the transcendental concept of Nirvana. Thus shall disciples be delivered from the immeasurable, innumerable, and illimitable world of sentient life, but, in reality, there is no world of sentient life from which to seek deliverance. And why? Because, in the minds of enlightened disciples there have ceased to exist such arbitrary concepts of phenomena as an entity, a being, a living being, a personality.”
The
Lord Buddha resumed: “Moreover, Subhuti, an enlightened disciple in his acts
of charity, ought to act spontaneously, uninfluenced by such things as form,
sound, taste, odour, touch, discrimination, and favoritism. It is imperative
that an enlightened disciple, in the exercise of charity, should act independent
of phenomena. And why? Because, acting without regard to illusive forms of
phenomena, he will realise in the exercise of charity a merit inestimable and
immeasurable.
“Subhuti,
what think you? Is it possible to estimate the distances that comprise the
illimitable universe of space?”
Subhuti
replied: “Blessed One! It is impossible to estimate the distances comprising
the illimitable universe of space.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “It is equally impossible to estimate the merit of an
enlightened disciple who practises charity unperturbed by the disturbing
influences of Phenomena. Subhuti, the minds of all disciples ought thus to be
taught.”
Sila Paramita—Ideal
Behavior
The Lord Buddha
addressing Subhuti, said: “What think you? If a benevolent person bestowed as
alms an abundance of the seven treasures sufficient to fill the universe, would
there accrue to that person a considerable merit?”
Subhuti
replied, saying: “A very considerable merit; Honored of the Worlds! Because
what is referred to does not partake of the nature of ordinary merit; in that
sense the Lord Buddha rightly speaks of ‘a considerable merit.’”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “If a disciple studies and adheres with implicit faith
to even a stanza of this Scripture, the intrinsic merit of such a disciple would
be relatively greater. And why? Because, the Tathagatas who have attained
supreme spiritual wisdom, all owe their beginning to the Truth of this sacred
Scripture—the Truth of Emptiness and Egolessness.”
“What
do you think, Subhuti? If a disciple, whether man or woman, were to collect a
store of precious gems as great as this universe and was to bestow them on the
holy Tathagatas, would that disciple on the strength of his gift lay up a large
stock of merit?”
Subhuti
replied: “Yes, Blessed One, he would lay up a very great merit.”
The
Lord Buddha replied: “Subhuti, if another disciple after reading even one
verse of this Scripture and observing it by living a good life, he will lay up a
greater merit than the one who merely makes gifts in charity and continues his
egoistic life. And why? Because, making gifts may or may not involve an advance
along the Path that leads to Nirvana, but this Scripture points the way to the
stages of Bodhisattvahood and the supreme spiritual enlightenment of the Buddhas.
The disciple who sincerely reads this Scripture and lives a virtuous life is
laying up merit immeasurable. But, Subhuti, a virtuous life, even the life of a
Buddha, what is it? There is no such thing, it is only a name.
“Subhuti, suppose a man had a body as large as Mount Sumeru, would he be counted a great man?”
Subhuti
replied: “Exceedingly great, Honored of the Worlds!”
The
Lord Buddha enquired: “Would his mind and heart be correspondingly great,
Subhuti? What is it that makes a man great? Is it the size of his body? Is it
his unusual personality? Is it the work he accomplishes? Or is it the wisdom and
compassion and selflessness of this behavior? Subhuti, what is behavior? There
is no such thing; it is something the mind imagines, just like body and
personality; it is only a name.
Then
the Lord Buddha continued: “Nevertheless, if a good disciple, man or woman,
studies this Scripture and thoughtfully observes even a verse of it, his merit
will be very great. What words can express the merit of a disciple who, living
with restraint and kindness, diligently studies and observes it! Such a disciple
is attaining powers commensurate with the supreme and most wonderful Dharma.
Wherever there is the hermitage of such a good disciple, it is the
treasure-house of this sacred Scripture; it is a shrine of the Lord Buddha; and
over it will hover uncounted Bodhisattvas of highest reverence and honor.”
Kshanti Paramita—Ideal
Patience
At that time the
Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: “If a good disciple, whether man or
woman, devoted to the observance and study of this Scripture, is thereby lightly
esteemed or despised, it is because, in a previous life there had been committed
some grievous transgression, now followed by its inexorable retribution. But,
although in this life lightly esteemed or despised, he bears it patiently, the
compensating merit thus acquired will cause the transgression of a former life
to be fully expiated, and the patient disciple will be adequately recompensed by
his final attainment of supreme spiritual enlightenment.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “Numberless ages ago, Subhuti, before the advent of
Dipankara Buddha, there were many other Buddhas and I recall my difficult
experiences while serving them and receiving their religious instruction and
discipline, but I endured it patiently and, because my conduct was entirely
blameless and without reproach, I was reborn in the days of Dipankara Buddha.
But in the ages to come, if a disciple faithfully study and put into practice
the teaching of this Scripture, the merit that he will thus acquire will far
exceed the merit of my service in the days of those many Buddhas.
“In
a previous life, Subhuti, when the Prince of Kalinga severed the flesh from my
limbs and body, because of the discipline I had undergone in the past I remained
patient, I was oblivious to such ideas as phenomena as an entity, a person, a
living person, a personality. If I had not been oblivious to such ideas, when my
limbs and body were torn apart, there would have originated in my mind feelings
of anger and resentment. I recollect, five hundred incarnations ago, that I was
practising this Kshanti Paramita and, because of it, I got rid of such arbitrary
ideas. Therefore, Subhuti, an enlightened disciple ought to discard, as being
unreal and illusive, every conceivable form of hindering phenomena.
“Subhuti,
in aspiring to supreme spiritual wisdom, the mind ought to be insensible to
every sensuous influence, and be independent of everything pertaining to form,
sound, odour, taste, touch, or discrimination. There ought to be cultivated a
condition of complete independence of mind; because, if the mind is depending
upon any external thing, it is cherishing a delusion; in reality, there is
nothing external to the mind. Even the whole realm of sentient life is ephemeral
and illusory. Therefore, in the exercise of this Paramita, the mind of an
enlightened disciple ought to be unperturbed by any form of phenomena.”
The
Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: “If an enlightened disciple in the
exercise of this Paramita was patient in the face of external difficulties and
steadily studied and observed this Scripture; and another disciple, realising
that within the meaning and purport of it, there could be no abstract individual
existence—no suffering, no one to suffer, no one to attain supreme spiritual
enlightenment—and yet patiently accepts it and continues to perfect himself in
its virtue, this disciple will have a cumulative merit greater than the former.
And why? Because, he is unaffected by any consideration of merit or reward.”
Subhuti
enquired of the Lord Buddha: “In what respect are enlightened disciples
unaffected by merit or reward?”
The
Lord Buddha replied: “Enlightened disciples, having patiently accepted the
truth of egolessness, do not aspire for supreme enlightenment in any spirit of
covetousness or acquisitiveness; they never think of merit and its commensurate
reward. But the Tathagata, because of his perfect wisdom, knows of their
patience and knows that for them there is reserved a cumulative merit that is
immeasurable and illimitable.”
Virya Paramita—Ideal
Zeal
The Lord Buddha said to Subhuti: “If within this universe a good disciple heaped together the seven treasures forming many elevations as Mount Sumeru, and entirely bestowed these treasures on the Tathagata as a gift in his exercise of charity; and another disciple sacrificed his life as many times as there are grains of sand in the river Ganges, would such disciples accumulate great merit, Subhuti?”
Subhuti
replied: “They would accumulate great merit, indeed, Blessed One.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “If a good disciple were to select a single verse of
this Scripture, faithfully observe and study it, and then zealously explain it
to others, he would relatively accumulate a greater merit.”
“Subhuti,
if a disciple takes pleasure in a narrow and exclusive form of doctrine, or is
attached to false ideas as to an entity, a being, a living being, a personality,
he cannot receive with profit the instruction of this Scripture nor can he find
delight in its study. This Scripture is intended for those who are entering upon
the path, as well as for those who are attaining the highest planes of spiritual
wisdom. If a disciple zealously observes, studies and widely disseminates the
knowledge of this Scripture, for such an one there will be cumulative merit,
immeasurable, incomparable, illimitable, inconceivable. All such disciples will
be endowed with transcendent spiritual wisdom and enlightenment.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “What think you? May an enlightened disciple ponder
within himself, saying, ‘I will create numerous Buddhist Kingdoms?’”
Subhuti
replied: “No, Honored of the Worlds! And why? Because, such thoughts would be
incompatible with the Virya Paramita, and kingdoms thus imagined would not, in
reality, be Buddhist Kingdoms. Such a phrase as ‘the creation of Buddhist
Kingdoms,’ is merely a figure of speech.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “What think you, Subhuti? Do you imagine that the
Tathagata reflects within himself, ‘I will bring salvation to all beings’?
Entertain no such delusive thought. And why? Because, in reality, there is no
such dharma as ‘salvation’ for any one; and there is no such thing as a
living being to whom ‘salvation’ can be brought. What is referred to as an
entity, a being, a living being, a personality, is not so in reality—it is
only so understood by ignorant and uneducated people.”
The
Lord Buddha enquired of Subhuti, saying: “May a disciple who has ‘entered
the stream’ which bears on to Nirvana, thus moralise within himself: I have
attained the fruits commensurate with the merits of one who has ‘entered the
stream’?”
Subhuti
replied: “No, Honored of the Worlds! And why? Because, ‘entered the
stream’ is simply a descriptive term. A disciple who avoids the seductions of
form, sound, odour, taste, touch, and their discriminations, is merely called,
‘one who has entered the stream.’”
The
Lord Buddha again enquired of Subhuti, saying: “What think you? Is a bhikshu
who is subject to only one more reincarnation, to muse within himself, ‘I have
obtained the fruits in agreement with the merits of “a once returner?”
Subhuti replied, saying: “No, Honored of the Worlds! And why? Because, ‘a
once returner’ is merely a descriptive title denoting only one more
reincarnation; but, in reality, there is no such condition as ‘only one more
reincarnation.’ ‘A once returner’ is merely a descriptive title.”
The
Lord Buddha once again enquired of Subhuti, saying: “What think you? May a
bhikshu who has attained so high a degree of spiritual merit that he is never
again to be reincarnated, may he thus reflect within himself, I have obtained
the fruits which accord with the merits of one who is never to return to this
world of life-and-death?” Subhuti replied, saying: “No, Honored of the
Worlds! And why? Because, ‘a never returner’ is merely a designation,
meaning, ‘immunity from reincarnation’; but, in reality, there is no such
condition, hence ‘a never returner’ is merely a convenient name.”
The
Lord Buddha yet again enquired of Subhuti, saying: “What think you? May a
Bodhisattva who has attained to absolute tranquillity of mind thus meditate
within himself: I have obtained the position of an Arhat?” Subhuti replied,
saying: “No, Honored of the Worlds! And why? Because, in reality, there is no
such condition synonymous with the term Arhat. If an Arhat thus meditates within
himself, ‘I have obtained the condition of an Arhat,’ there would be the
obvious occurrence to his mind of such arbitrary concepts as an entity, a being,
a living being, a personality. When the Blessed One declared of me that in
tranquillity of mind, observance of the Dharma and spiritual perception, I was
preeminent among the disciples, I did not think within myself: ‘I am free from
desire, I am an Arhat.’ Had I thought thus, the Blessed One would not have
declared concerning me: ‘Subhuti delights in the austerities of an Arhat.’
It was because I was perfectly tranquil and oblivious to all conditions, that
the Lord Buddha declared: ‘Subhuti delights in the austerities practised by
the Arhats.’”
The
Lord Buddha added: “True, Subhuti! Enlightened disciples in the exercise of
the Viya Paramita ought to maintain within themselves a pure and single mind;
they should be unconscious of sensuous conditions and cultivate a mind that is
independent of material circumstances. And why? Because, all sensuous conditions
and material circumstances are only manifestations of mind and are alike
dream-like and imaginary.
“Subhuti,
A Bodhisattva should have a heart filled with compassion for all sentient life,
but if he should think within his mind: ‘I will deliver all beings,’ he
ought not to be called a Bodhisattva. And why? Because, in the first place, if
there is no living being, no personality, then there is no one to be called a
Bodhisattva. And in the second place, the Tathagata has declared: ‘All beings
are without self, without life, without personality.’ Who then is to be
delivered? If a Bodhisattva were to say: ‘I will create many Buddha-lands,’
he would say what is untrue. And why, Because, the idea of a Buddha-land is
wholly imaginary, it is only a name.
“But
O Subhuti, the Bodhisattva who believes that all things are without selfhood,
and still has compassion and faith, he is, indeed, a noble minded Bodhisattva,
and is so considered by the all-wise Tathagatas.”
Dhyana Paramita—Ideal
Tranquillity
Subhuti enquired
of the Lord Buddha, saying: “Honored of the Worlds! In future ages, when this
scripture is proclaimed amongst those beings destined to hear it, shall any
conceive within their minds a sincere, unmingled faith?”
The Lord Buddha replied, saying: “Have no such apprehensive thought. Even at the remote period of five centuries subsequent to the Nirvana of the Tathagata, there will be many disciples observing the monastic vows and assiduously devoted to good works. These, hearing this Scripture proclaimed, will believe in its immutability and will conceive within their minds a pure, unmingled faith. Besides, it is important to realise that faith thus conceived, is not exclusively in virtue of the individual thought of any particular Buddha, but because of its affiliation with the universal thought of all the myriad Buddhas throughout the infinite ages. Therefore, among the beings destined to hear this Scripture proclaimed, many, by the Dhyana Paramita, will intuitively conceive a pure and holy faith.
“Subhuti,
the Tathagata by his prescience is perfectly cognisant of all such potential
disciples, and for these also there is reserved an immeasurable merit. And why?
Because, the minds of these will not revert to such arbitrary concepts of
phenomena as an entity, a being, a living being, a personality, having qualities
or ideas coincident with the Dharma, or existing apart from the principle of the
Dharma. And why? Because, assuming the permanency and reality of phenomena, the
minds of these disciples would be involved in such distinctive ideas as an
entity, a being, a living being, a personality. Affirming the permanency and
reality of qualities or ideas coincident with the Dharma, their minds would
inevitably be involved in resolving these same definitions. Postulating the
inviolate nature of qualities or ideas which have an existence apart from the
Dharma, there yet remains to be explained these abstruse distinctions—an
entity, a being, a living being, a personality. Therefore, enlightened disciples
ought not to affirm the permanency or reality of qualities or ideas coincident
with the Dharma, nor postulate as being of an inviolate nature, qualities and
ideas having an existence apart from the concept of the Dharma.
“Thus
enlightened disciples are enabled to appreciate the significance of the words
which the Tathagatas invariably repeat to their follows: ‘Disciples must
realise that the Dharma is presented to your minds in the simile of a raft.’
If the Dharma—having fulfilled its function in bearing you to the other
shore—must be abandoned together with all its coincident qualities and ideas,
how much more inevitable must be the abandonment of qualities and ideas which
have an existence apart from the Dharma?”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “If a disciple had an amount of treasure sufficient to
fill the illimitable universe and bestowed it upon the Tathagata in the exercise
of charity, and if another disciple, having aspired to supreme spiritual wisdom,
selected from this Scripture even a stanza of four lines only, observed it,
diligently studied it and with zeal explained it to others, the cumulative merit
of such a disciple would be relatively greater than the merit of the former.
But, Subhuti, the attitude of his mind in which he explained it is important. It
should be explained with a mind filled with compassion but free from any
assumption as to the reality of an entity, a being, a living being, a
personality, or as to the permanency or reality of earthly phenomena, or as to
the validity of any ideas concerning them. And why? Because the phenomena of
life are like a dream, a phantasm, a bubble, a shadow, the glistening dew, a
lightning flash; thus should they be contemplated by an enlightened disciple.
His mind should, at all times, be resting in the blessedness of tranquillity
which invariably accompanies the practice of the Dhyana Paramita.”
(Regarding
the Dhyana Paramita—Ideal Tranquillity—the Sutra says: “The beginner
should consider and practise Dhyana in two aspects: as cessation of the mind’s
intellectual activities, and as realisation of insight. To bring all mental
states that produce vagrant thinking to a stand is called cessation. To
adequately understand the transitory and emptiness and egolessness of all things
is insight. At first each of them should be practised separately by the
beginner, but when, by degrees, he attains facility, and finally attains
perfection, the two aspects will naturally blend into one perfect state of
mental tranquillity. Those who practise Dhyana should dwell in solitude and,
sitting erect, should remain motionless, seeking to quiet the mind. Do not fix
the thoughts on any definite thing that you have sensed or discriminated, or
memorised; all particularisations, all imaginations, all recollections, are to
be excluded, because all things are uncreate, devoid of all attributes, ever
changing. In all thinking, something precedes that has been awakened by an
external stimuli, so in Dhyana one should seek to abandon all notions connected
with an external world. Then in thinking, something follows that has been
elaborated in his own mind; so he should seek to abandon thinking. Because his
attention is distracted by the external world, he is warned to turn to his
inner, intuitive consciousness. If the process of mentation begins again, he is
warned not to let his mind become attached to anything, because, independent of
mind they have no existence. Dhyana is not at all to be confined to sitting
erect in meditation; one’s mind should be concentrated at all times, whether
sitting, standing, moving, working; one should constantly discipline himself to
that end. Gradually entering into the state of Samadhi, he will transcend all
hindrances and become strengthened in faith, a faith that will be immovable.”)
The
Lord Buddha resumed his words to Subhuti, saying: “What think you, Subhuti,
are the atoms of dust in the myriad worlds which comprise the universe, are they
very numerous?”
Subhuti
replied: “Very numerous, indeed, Blessed One.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “Subhuti, these atoms of dust, many as they are, are
not in reality ‘atoms of dust,’ they are merely termed so. Moreover, these
‘myriad worlds’ are not really worlds, they are merely termed so because of
ignorance.
“Subhuti,
if a good disciple were to take these infinite worlds and reduce them to
exceedingly minute particles of dust and blow them away into space, would the
so-called ‘infinite worlds’ cease to exist?”
Subhuti
replied: “The Blessed One has already taught us that ‘myriad worlds’ is
only a name; how can that which is only a name, cease to exist?”
Then
the Lord Buddha continued: “True, Subhuti, but if it were otherwise, and the
infinite worlds were a reality, then it would be asserting the unity and
eternality of matter, which every one knows is dream-like, changing and
transitory. Unity and eternality of matter, indeed! There is neither matter, nor
unity, nor eternality—they are merely names. Belief in the unity and
eternality of matter is incomprehensible; only common and worldly minded people,
for purely materialistic reasons, cling to that hypothesis. Subhuti, enlightened
disciples must thoroughly understand that emptiness and egolessness are
characteristic of’ all Truth. The Dhyana Paramita can be successfully
practised only from that viewpoint.”
Then
the Lord Buddha continued: “If a disciple should affirm that the Tathagata had
enunciated a doctrine that the mind could comprehend the idea of an entity, a
being, a living being, a personality, or ally other discrimination, would that
disciple be interpreting aright the meaning of this Scripture?”
Subhuti
replied: “Blessed One, that disciple would not be interpreting aright the
meaning of the Lord Buddha’s discourse. And why? Because, Blessed One, when
you discoursed on belief in the reality of an entity, a being, a living being, a
personality, it was plainly declared that there were no such things; that they
were entirely unreal and illusive; that they were merely words.”
The
Lord Buddha continued: “Subhuti, the disciples who aspire to supreme spiritual
wisdom ought thus to know, to believe in, and to interpret all phenomena. They
ought to eliminate from their minds every seeming evidence of concrete objects;
they ought to eliminate from their minds even the notions of such things; and
become oblivious to every idea connected with them. And why? Because, so long as
he cherishes ideas of and concerning an entity, a being, a living being, a
personality, his mind is kept in confusion. He must even become oblivious to the
idea that there is any one to whom the idea of sentient life can become
oblivious. If he were to think within his mind, ‘I must become oblivious to
every idea of sentient life,’ he could not be described as being wholly
enlightened. And why? Because, within the bounds of reality there is no such
thing, no entity, no being, no living being, no personality, nothing whatever
that can be discriminated, and therefore, there can be no reality to ideas
concerning them, for all these things are merely manifestations of the mind
itself.”
Subhuti
enquired, saying: “Blessed One, in the ages to come, will sentient beings
destined to hear this Dharma, awaken within their minds these essential elements
of faith?”
The
Lord Buddha replied, smiling: “Subhuti, it cannot be asserted that there are
or will be any such things as sentient beings, nor can it be asserted that there
will not be. At present there are none, they are merely termed ‘sentient
beings.’ And as to any one being saved: how can there be one to find it by
seeking, or to know it if it is ever found? One cannot gain self-realisation of
Prajna Paramita without transcending the conscious faculty. To fully realise
emptiness, egolessness, imagelessness by the use of the discriminating mind is
futile. It is only by practising the Dhyana Paramita, by identifying oneself
with emptiness and egolessness, that emptiness and egolessness is to be realised.
In the exercise of the Dhyana Paramita, unless the mind of the enlightened
disciple is independent of all phenomena, he is like a person lost in
impenetrable darkness, to whom every object is invisible and himself helpless.
But an enlightened disciple practising the Paramita with a mind independent of
every phenomena, is like unto a person to whom suddenly the power of vision is
restored, and he sees every thing as in the meridian glory of the sunlight.”
The
Lord Buddha said:
“Not
by means of visible form,
Not
by audible sound,
Is
Buddha to be perceived;
Only
in the solitude and purity of Dhyana
Is
one to realise the blessedness of Buddha.”